<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stories about our time, over time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robinsloan.com/2009/62/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robinsloan.com/2009/62</link>
	<description>Writer &#38; media inventor. This is where I share notes, ideas &#38; works in progress—just about every day!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:38:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://robinsloan.com/2009/62/comment-page-1#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsloan.com/?p=62#comment-322</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s quite common for playwrights to keep rewriting, though often that stops once the play is published by one of the major houses.  Still, Peter Shaffer has been rewriting Amadeus for years, even after it won a Tony.

And of course, on the novelist side, Dave Eggers reissued his modified &quot;You Shall Know our Velocity&quot; as &quot;Sacrament.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s quite common for playwrights to keep rewriting, though often that stops once the play is published by one of the major houses.  Still, Peter Shaffer has been rewriting Amadeus for years, even after it won a Tony.</p>
<p>And of course, on the novelist side, Dave Eggers reissued his modified “You Shall Know our Velocity” as “Sacrament.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete W</title>
		<link>http://robinsloan.com/2009/62/comment-page-1#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsloan.com/?p=62#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey Archer is releasing a completely reworked version of Kane and Abel. Other than that, I can&#039;t think of any...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey Archer is releasing a completely reworked version of Kane and Abel. Other than that, I can’t think of any…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flory</title>
		<link>http://robinsloan.com/2009/62/comment-page-1#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>flory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsloan.com/?p=62#comment-318</guid>
		<description>if i&#039;m not mistaken, Thomas Hardy. he revised almost all his novels for consistency in time and place (but was kind of lax about the former), and to make sure they were geographically correct. Wessex = Dorset (or something) and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i’m not mistaken, Thomas Hardy. he revised almost all his novels for consistency in time and place (but was kind of lax about the former), and to make sure they were geographically correct. Wessex = Dorset (or something) and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james mcnally</title>
		<link>http://robinsloan.com/2009/62/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>james mcnally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsloan.com/?p=62#comment-319</guid>
		<description>one springs to mind immediately - Charles Darwin.  His &quot;Origin of Species&quot; went through several revisions, and he added religious content which wasn&#039;t in the first edition.  This occurred as he was becoming religious himself - he either adapted his theories to fit, or to suit others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one springs to mind immediately — Charles Darwin.  His “Origin of Species” went through several revisions, and he added religious content which wasn’t in the first edition.  This occurred as he was becoming religious himself — he either adapted his theories to fit, or to suit others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
